In spring Of 2018, thousands of Google employees have put pressure on the company fall An important artificial intelligence contract with the Pentagon. Also the technology giant Engaged Do not use it for uspons or a certain surveillance system in the future.
The victory, which arrived in the midst of a wave of unprecedented protests guided by employees, contributed to inspiring a new generation of technological activists in Silicon Valley. But seven years later, the legacy of that moment is more complicated. Google recently revised Its ethical principles of the AI to allow some of the previously prohibited cases of use, and companies of the whole sector are releasing Powerful new artificial intelligence tools at the speed of interruption.
We kill, the IA now Institute, a Think Tank that the social implications of artificial intelligence have published a Swept On the current panorama of the AI, in detail the way in which power is becoming concentrated in a handful of dominant companies that have modeled the narrative on technology to their advantage. The authors suggest new strategies on how activists, groups of civil society and workers can earn power in a radically changed environment.
The authors indicate the declarations of the figures of the technological industry that affirm that the dawn of superintelligence for all power is right for the corner development they believe will be utopian in which humanity can quickly find care for cancer or resolve climate change. This idea has become the topic to put an end to other topics, a technological milestone that is such an abstract and absolute stand that obtains the default priority on Odans and, in fact, all the other ends “, write the authors of the relationship.
Among its recommendations, the IA is now urgent defense and research groups to connect the IA-related to wider economic concerns, such as work safety and the future of work. While the negative impacts of artificial intelligence were previously hidden or abstract for employees in many sectors, the previously stable career paths are now interrupted in many different parts of the economy, from the engineering of the software to education.
The authors see an opportunity for workers to resist the way the IA is distributed and reject against the discussion points of the technological industry that frame results as a loss of work widespread as inevitable. This could be particularly powerful in a political climate in which the Republicans have positioned themselves as the party of the working class, although the Trump administration is contrary to most of the AI regulation.
The authors indicate several cases of study in the relationship in which workers succeeded the implementation of the AI in their companies or ensured that the guardrails were implemented. An example is National Nurses United, a union that has organized protests against the use of artificial intelligence in health care and has presented its own surry which shows that technology can undermine the clinical judgment and threaten patient safety. Activism has led a certain number of hospitals to establish new artificial intelligence supervision mechanisms and resize the launch of some automated tools.
“The unique thing at this moment is this push to integrate the IA everywhere. It is granting technological companies and people who manage them types of power that go to make a single in-depth grass of the pockets,” says Sarah Myers West, co-executive director of Ai Now and one of the authors of the authors of the relationship. “We are talking about this profound social and economic and political remodeling of the production of our life, and this needs a different way of taking into account the damage”.
