Democratic leaders and professional medical organizations observed the decision of the Supreme Court on Wednesday when maintaining a Tennesses Act 2023, which prohibits the gender-known supply of transgender mountain people, a decision that the Hight Court provided ideological boundaries that have an impact on influencing the Simmilar laws that were adopted in approximately half of the country.

The three democratically appointed judiciary of the Supreme Court dampen with the conservative majority. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, summarized by Joint by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, said on Wednesday, “Leave Transgender Children and other families on political moods.”

“Politicians and judges have the mercury in the examination rooms” On the social platform X. “This decision undermines doctors to provide some of the most endangered patients in our country.”

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (DC), whose grandson is transgender, Said the court’s decision May families who live in Tennessee and other countries with restrictions on gender -specific care for vacation their houses to “ensure that their children can go into medical necessity”.

Including Tennessee, 25 Republicans since 2021 Picked laws Prohibition of relatives of the health professions, puberty blockers, hormone therapy and rare operation for transgender -yout. The judicial challenges for these laws were met with mixed results.

The answers of other democratic legislators were more successful.

“That is just written,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-ORE.).

Merkley, Senate sponsor of the Equal Opportunities Act, submitted, An amicus letter At the end of last year, the Supreme Court asked the law of Tennessee together with Senage Sen together with the law of Tennessee. Ed brandy (D-Mass.) And democratic representative Mark Pocan (Wis.), Jerry Nadler (NY) and Frank Pallone (NJ), who also denounced the courts on Wednesday.

“Hate won today,” said Markay In a statement.

In 2023, Markay and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), Whose adult child is transgender, were introduced The transgender Bill of RightsA pioneering decision to recognize the responsibility of the federal government for the protection and codification of transas rights and non -binary people across the country.

From his office in Seattle, Jayapal told reporters on Wednesday afternoon that the judicial judgment “a cruel policy, the life of the people” with the decision.

Some of the loudest critics of the congress of gender care were not calm on Wednesday. In A contribution to XRep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R-GA.) Mentions the Directorly case.

The Republican Attorney General of Tennessee, Jonathan Skrmetti, celebrated the judgment of the court and said that the “common sense” of the voters, who looked up against “legal activism”.

“A cross -party super majority of Tennesses choice of representatives carefully looked at the evidence and voted to protect children from irreversible decisions that they have not yet fully understood,” wrote Skrmetti In a statementFollow the decision.

“This victory exceeds politics,” he added. “It’s about real Tennessee children who have real fights.

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPath), an international non -profit organization that develops the transgender standards for transgender health care, described a “poor setback for transgender health and human rights in the USA on Wednesday”.

“This decision will enable Effileway to ban evidence -based gender -specific health care for Thouss and the various young people and their families.

“Such a judgment does not improvise the basic institution that gives transgender youth when they can achieve care, and are violated when the governor is in between and the product experts travel.” Let us be clear – health bans of all kinds are in stigmatization, misinformation, and this is in this care to the use of youth. ”

WPATH, formerly the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association, has reserved the transgender health since 1979, but recently received a goal of the White and Republicans in confessions who claim that the organization manipulates its results to promote a political aganda. In an implementation regulation in January to eliminate the support of the federal government for the gender -specific care of minors, Trump said the guidance of the organization in relation to the treatment “

In a unanimous opinion on Wednesday on Wednesday, the judicial clamp, one of the leading conservatives of the Supreme Court, said that Christ should not shift to “self -described experts” about gender -known care and claim to assert “prominent medical specialists”, including those who are worried with Wadbad, have “grave problems” accumulations that gather their meetings.

“You have built up your medical recommendations to achieve political goals,” wrote Thomas.

In A joint explanation On Wednesday, six other medical groups led by the endocrine society said they were “disappointed” by the highest courtesy, of which they claimed that they would increase, increase or eliminate the ability of families and patients to have access to medical care.

“Decisions on medical care must be evaluated in consultation with qualified specialists in consultation with the patient and other parents or legal guardians, and the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of obstetricians and the gynecologists from the National Association Association, wrote, the National Association Association, wrote. The National Association Association and the National Association Association, the National Association and the National Association and the National Association and National Association Association and the National Association Association and the National Association of Pediatrician.

The six organization, part of An earlier Amicus letter In this case against Tennessee’s law, members of the health professions “have to be able to rely on their training, education and to expect them to use the app process care on the basis of the needs and values ​​of every painkillers and their family without bans or interface.”

In A separate statementSusan J. Krassly, President of the American Academy of Pediatrics, will have the judgment of the court on Wednesday “for the health and well -being of transgender people from nationwide and the doctors who take care of them,” extremely and far -reaching consequences.

“In order to be clear to today’s legal decision, the science still supports gender-specific care, children will still need them.”

Adrian Shanker, who led the LGBTQI+health policy in the Ministry of Health and Human Services (HHS) under the administration of President Biden, told the Hill in an interview that the Bowme on Wednesday was the decision of Christ on gender care.

“It is really just about isolated incidence – it is a shift political that has made it very different for trans people to achieve the care that your body needs, and ultimately this will only lead to considerable damage to one of the marginalized population groups in our socialization,” said Shanker.

In May Trump’s HHS broke out with large medical groups, which said that gender -specific care for transitions and adults was taken into account Is medically necessaryIn a report that is not signed, the explanation is a “lack of robust evidence” in order to support the provision of such words for minors.

Trump, who strongly campaigned against the promise to prohibit gender care for the youth, asked in addition to his ordering the executive to say goodbye to the congress, “permanently say goodbye to the prohibition and criminalization of gender changes for children and to end the lie forever that every child traces the wrongly stressed.”

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) also instructed states to not use Medicaid Finance for the supply of transitional freedom for minors, and reactively demanded young people who hand over data on their standards of care and finance.

The White House returned an application for a statement on Wednesday judgment on Wednesday.

Do not harm a medical group that is committed to gender care for the youth, applauded the Court of Justice, who said the organization of the chairman Stanley Goldfarb, “ending the debate about laws such as Tennessee’s”.

Kristina Rasmussen, the group’s executive director, said she planned to work for similar bans for the transition base in other countries.

Jamie Reed, former case clerk at the Transgender Center of the Washington University, who had helped to prohibit the support of gender -specific care for minors, said the decision on Wednesday, said the decision that Whatblower, Parens and Dettranitioners had said. “

“These are not populated, safe or evidence-based practices,” said Reed, now Co-Executive Director of the LGB Couch in Coalition, an organization that is triggered by the transition to publish Cara for young people in one layer. “They are inventions with high risk that children have driven in the name of ideology.”